<look stupid> And here the newsgroup
was telling me about “check the date”. April Fool’s Day
did not even dawn on me! (“…can’t see the forest
through the trees….”) Boy, joe, you must write convincingly, or
maybe I was too focused on New
Zealand and those Brown Trout! </look
stupid> :-o
Mike Thommes
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:04
PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] joe
- please say it isn't so!
It ain't so. :)
Happy April Fool's day...
Though I have to say, it felt good writing
that. Building a fountain in the middle of New Zealand so you can appreciate
it from a hammock sounds like a good gig.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M.
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 3:28
PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joe -
please say it isn't so!
So here I went to take a look at
Dean’s article, and I find this: http://blog.joeware.net/cat/recipes/
, expecting to find more of joe’s great adfind codes. At first, I
thought it got misfiled and should have been filed under “humor”
but I suspect this is hardly funny. Joe, are you pulling our collective
legs? Please tell me this blog is a poor Michigander’s joke!
If not, please take me with you to New Zealand
– I need to see first hand that the Brown Trout there are bigger than
they are in Michigan!
;-)
Mike Thommes
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matheesha Weerasinghe
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 2:02
PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir]
I think thats an understatement ;-)
However, my profuse thanks to joe too. I wasnt aware of the article
until he blogged it.
On 8/14/06, Dean
Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why thank you … but who said otherwise? ;0)
I dont
care what anyone says. Thats a damn fine article.
I couldnt
possibly thank Dean enough for that info.
M@
On
8/14/06, Graham Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Alter ego
!
my thanks are due
worked out a treat - so the GC's are not so ***'d as i thought
any info on the concept of the phantoms though ??
GT
> Hey Robert,
>
> In the article you posted, the registry key is incorrect in the KB
> content. It lists the registry key as:
> HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Directory
>
> However, the correct registry key is:
> HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Directory UI
>
> I've sent a comment to my former employer to ask for them to fix the
> article...next time, test it *before* you post!
>
> Your Alter Ego,
> Robert Williams
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Williams,
> Robert
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
>
> Hey Graham,
>
> This may not be what you're experiencing, but it could be worth it to
> check to see how many members you have in the group(s) in
question. By
> default, if the group has over 500 members in it, the user icons inside
> the group will turn grey. Check out this article for more
information:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q281923/
>
> Let us know if that turned out to be the cause.
>
> Have a great day!
>
> Robert Williams
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Graham Turner
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir]
>
> Dear all, am experiencing issues that i think attributable to the
> concept of Active
> Directory phantoms
>
> the symptom is that when we open certain global groups the membership
> list comes out
> with grey icons
>
> this is not all groups - affected ones being - Domain Users / Domain
> computers
>
> must confess to not a full understanding of the issue here -but it seems
> this
> relates in some way to GC lookup ??
>
> i can for sure confirm that the GC port 3268 is open on the GC's
>
> not sure why as the group / user members are in the same domain ?
>
> after the understanding of what is going on here is, of course 'HOW DO
> WE FIX' ??
>
> technet seems to reference a concept of 'phantom clean up task' - a
> process that
> runs on the server running 'INFRASTRUCURE MASTER' fsmo role on a
> scheduled basis to
> resolve the directory issue.
>
> would seem not in this case ?
>
> as a point to note, neither netdiag or dcdiag are coming up with nothing
> concliusive
> in this respect.
>
> help as always gladly received
>
> GT
>
>
> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
