<look stupid> And
here the newsgroup was telling me about “check the date”. April Fool’s Day
did not even dawn on me! (“…can’t see the forest through the trees….”)
Boy, joe, you must write convincingly, or maybe I was too focused on New
Zealand and those Brown Trout! </look
stupid> :-o
Mike
Thommes
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:04
PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] joe - please
say it isn't so!
It ain't so.
:)
Happy April Fool's
day...
Though I have to say,
it felt good writing that. Building a fountain in the middle of
New
Zealand so you can appreciate it from a hammock
sounds like a good gig.
--
O'Reilly Active
Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael
M.
Sent: Monday, August 14,
2006 3:28 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joe - please say
it isn't so!
So here I went to take
a look at Dean’s article, and I find this: http://blog.joeware.net/cat/recipes/
, expecting to find more of joe’s great adfind codes. At first, I thought
it got misfiled and should have been filed under “humor” but I suspect this is
hardly funny. Joe, are you pulling our collective legs? Please tell
me this blog is a poor Michigander’s joke! If not, please take me with you
to New Zealand – I need to
see first hand that the Brown Trout there are bigger than they are in Michigan!
;-)
Mike
Thommes
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matheesha
Weerasinghe
Sent: Monday,
August 14, 2006 2:02 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re:
[ActiveDir]
I think thats an understatement
;-)
However, my profuse thanks to joe too. I wasnt aware of
the article until he blogged it.
On 8/14/06, Dean Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why thank you … but who said
otherwise? ;0)
I dont care
what anyone says. Thats a damn fine article.
I couldnt
possibly thank Dean enough for that
info.
M@
On 8/14/06,
Graham Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alter ego
!
my thanks are due
worked out a treat - so the GC's are not so
***'d as i thought
any info on the concept of the phantoms though
??
GT
> Hey Robert,
>
> In the article you posted,
the registry key is incorrect in the KB
> content. It lists
the registry key as:
>
HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Directory
>
> However, the
correct registry key is:
>
HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Directory UI
>
> I've sent
a comment to my former employer to ask for them to fix the
>
article...next time, test it *before* you post!
>
> Your Alter
Ego,
> Robert Williams
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Williams,
>
Robert
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir]
>
> Hey Graham,
>
> This may not be what
you're experiencing, but it could be worth it to
> check to see how many
members you have in the group(s) in question. By
> default, if
the group has over 500 members in it, the user icons inside
> the group
will turn grey. Check out this article for more information:
>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q281923/
>
> Let
us know if that turned out to be the cause.
>
> Have a great
day!
>
> Robert Williams
>
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Graham Turner
> Sent:
Monday, August 14, 2006 9:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir]
>
> Dear all, am experiencing issues that i think attributable to
the
> concept of Active
> Directory phantoms
>
> the
symptom is that when we open certain global groups the membership
> list
comes out
> with grey icons
>
> this is not all groups -
affected ones being - Domain Users / Domain
> computers
>
>
must confess to not a full understanding of the issue here -but it seems
> this
> relates in some way to GC lookup ??
>
> i can
for sure confirm that the GC port 3268 is open on the GC's
>
> not
sure why as the group / user members are in the same domain ?
>
>
after the understanding of what is going on here is, of course 'HOW DO
>
WE FIX' ??
>
> technet seems to reference a concept of 'phantom
clean up task' - a
> process that
> runs on the server running
'INFRASTRUCURE MASTER' fsmo role on a
> scheduled basis to
>
resolve the directory issue.
>
> would seem not in this case
?
>
> as a point to note, neither netdiag or dcdiag are coming up
with nothing
> concliusive
> in this respect.
>
> help
as always gladly received
>
> GT
>
>
> List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
> List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>
List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
