RE: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:50:14 -0700

The whole call was NDA so unfortunately I have no news to share.
 
I do have this to say though, if you or anyone feels this is something that MSFT DNS should be able to do smack your TAM on the butt and say "Hey TAM, earn your pay and listen up, we want this multiple view thing that Bind has had for like 6-7 years so go get it done."   :)
 
How many SBS'ers here use their SBS server to serve DNS to the world outside of their walls? I bet you guys would *really* like multi-view capability.
 
  joe
 
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

Couldn't make the con-call.
 
But we have been asking for this for some time now. Do you have any shareable info on what MS is doing along that line?
 

Sincerely,
   _____                               
  (, /  |  /)               /)     /)  
    /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _
 ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/                             /)     
                               (/      
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon

From: joe
Sent: Fri 9/1/2006 9:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

Heh, this was a topic on a MSFT concall yesterday... Bind 9 supports multiple views on zones based on external/internal (or other definitions) requests... Cuts down on the number of DNS servers required.
 
 
 
or better (depending on your viewpoint[1])
 
 
 
:)
 
 
[1] Boooo.
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 11:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

This doesn't do anything positive for him regarding his particular concerns. He is publishing internal records to the public.
 
I have seen some people argue that it is not a big deal to expose internal addresses/records unless the addresses are routable. Me? I say it is bad to mix your internal and external records on the same server. Unless you don't have a choice in terms of hardware limitations, you should split your internal and external zones. Ideally, you would want your internal domain name to be different from your external domain name. But, where that is not possible, use different servers for the DNS service. Point your internal servers and clients to the internal DNS servers and make sure that these are the only name servers listed in your DHCP and on the "Name Server" tab of the zone. Then, remove all internal records from the external DNS servers and make sure that these are the only servers listed externally at the Registrar for the domain.
 

Sincerely,
   _____                               
  (, /  |  /)               /)     /)  
    /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _
 ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/                             /)     
                               (/      
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon

From: Scott, Anthony
Sent: Fri 9/1/2006 8:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

All you should have to do is create an A record named www, point it to the internal IP of your web server. This will create an A record of www.domain.com

 

 

Thanks,

Anthony Scott

Microsoft Consultant

Mobile 616-481-9722 | Desk 616-464-6369 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS DOCUMENTATION

 

HI,

 

I have one of my client that has AD integrated DNS.

 

The internet domain is the same that the AD domain. (domain.com)

They have ns1 and ns2 to handle the internet domain, meaning mx, www, A ,etc records for domain.com, those are the external DNS servers.

And they also have several internal dns servers for AD.

 

The thing is I am able to query ns1 and ns2 from outside the office and find out everything for the domain, global catalogs, DC, etc

 

Is this the correct way to do it?

Anybody knows a good white paper or similar that deals with AD integrated DNS, internal and external dns, etc?

 

 

Thanks

 

Rezuma

 

Reply via email to