Heck even us SBSers know how to that :-)

E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" : Hey Peter! That was pretty easy!:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/04/25/92594.aspx
E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" : Debugging 101:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/06/22/102538.aspx
E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" : "The" debug presentation from TechEd:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/06/29/103239.aspx


(call me wacko but I love crash dumps.. they are fun  :-)

Laura A. Robinson wrote:
You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. We even used to
teach people how to do it back in the NT4 days. I loved that class. :-D
Laura

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Hoehn
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile

Hi,
Best practice used to be to put the pagefile on a different BUS than the OS. The idea is that you can read/write to both the OS and the PF at the same time. We always put the entire PF on a separate bus/drive in it's own partition. That way you have the added speed of a bus apart from the OS bus and a contiguous PF. We never bothered with a C: swapfile because we could never afford to send the dump to M$ for decryption. :-}

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile

Hi,
I have an answer and a question about the same.

Most of my servers have 2 partition, one for the OS and the other for data, I always put the pagefile in the data partition, so yes, you can have the have the whole thing in a different partition or hard drive.

Actually, Linux system always create a swap partition just for that purpose, so I wonder if it would be more efficient to always create a partition just for the pagefile... Anyone knows?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Wahlers
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile

Sorry for the reply to my own post, but this article:

http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/Windows2003
/AdminTips
/Miscellaneous/EnhancePerformancebyMovingthePagefile.html

says I can move the whole thing to a different partition. I'll leave a meg on the C drive just for the dumpfile, which we limit to 64K, in case the system crashes and I can actually figure out how to read the dumpfile.

But, really, is it OK to leave absolutely NO pagefile on C:/? We normally leave at least 200Mb on the C: partition when we move the rest to a different drive.


--
Larry Wahlers
Concordia Technologies
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct office line: (314) 996-1876



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Larry Wahlers
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Split pagefile

Colleagues,

Is there a best practice for splitting the pagefile on
Exchange 2003
across multiple drives? My C drive is up to nearly 9GB
used out of
10GB, and I'd like to move off most of the 3GB pagefile
to maybe the
database drive. We have only 500 users on that system, so
performance shouldn't
be too much of an issue.

Thanks in advance, folks.

--
Larry Wahlers
Concordia Technologies
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct office line: (314) 996-1876

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe:
http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been
contacted with.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM


--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com

If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will 
hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to