That's how you spend your Saturday nights? I suddenly feel waaay cooler (socially speaking) than I did five minutes ago, I gotta tell ya.
Laura > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > Beats having to read SEC17a and NASD guidelines on a saturday night. > > Martin Tuip > MVP-Exchange > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laura A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:21 PM > Subject: OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > > > You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. > We even used to > > teach people how to do it back in the NT4 days. I loved > that class. :-D > > > > Laura > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Hoehn > >> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:15 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > >> > >> Hi, > >> Best practice used to be to put the pagefile on a > >> different BUS than the OS. The idea is that you can > >> read/write to both the OS and the PF at the same time. We > >> always put the entire PF on a separate bus/drive in it's own > >> partition. That way you have the added speed of a bus apart > >> from the OS bus and a contiguous PF. We never bothered with a > >> C: swapfile because we could never afford to send the dump to > >> M$ for decryption. :-} > >> > >> Don > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ramon Linan > >> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:07 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have an answer and a question about the same. > >> > >> Most of my servers have 2 partition, one for the OS and the > >> other for data, I always put the pagefile in the data > >> partition, so yes, you can have the have the whole thing in a > >> different partition or hard drive. > >> > >> Actually, Linux system always create a swap partition just > >> for that purpose, so I wonder if it would be more efficient > >> to always create a partition just for the pagefile... Anyone knows? > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Larry Wahlers > >> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:09 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > >> > >> Sorry for the reply to my own post, but this article: > >> > >> http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/Windows2003 > >> /AdminTips > >> /Miscellaneous/EnhancePerformancebyMovingthePagefile.html > >> > >> says I can move the whole thing to a different partition. > >> I'll leave a meg on the C drive just for the dumpfile, which > >> we limit to 64K, in case the system crashes and I can > >> actually figure out how to read the dumpfile. > >> > >> But, really, is it OK to leave absolutely NO pagefile on C:/? > >> We normally leave at least 200Mb on the C: partition when we > >> move the rest to a different drive. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Larry Wahlers > >> Concordia Technologies > >> The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod > >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> direct office line: (314) 996-1876 > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >> Behalf Of > >> > > Larry Wahlers > >> > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:55 AM > >> > > To: Exchange Discussions > >> > > Subject: Split pagefile > >> > > > >> > > Colleagues, > >> > > > >> > > Is there a best practice for splitting the pagefile on > >> Exchange 2003 > >> > > across multiple drives? My C drive is up to nearly 9GB > >> used out of > >> > > 10GB, and I'd like to move off most of the 3GB pagefile > >> to maybe the > >> > > database drive. We have only 500 users on that system, so > >> > performance shouldn't > >> > > be too much of an issue. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks in advance, folks. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Larry Wahlers > >> > > Concordia Technologies > >> > > The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod > >> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > direct office line: (314) 996-1876 > >> > > > >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > >> > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange > >> > > To subscribe: > >> > http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ > >> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > >> > > Jupitermedia Corp. > >> > > Attn: Discussion List Management > >> > > 475 Park Avenue South > >> > > New York, NY 10016 > >> > > > >> > > Please include the email address which you have been > >> contacted with. > >> > > > >> > > > >> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >> List archive: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >> List archive: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email > Security System. > >> For more information please visit > >> http://www.messagelabs.com/email > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> > >> > >> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >> List archive: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > >> > >> -- > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release > >> Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM > >> > >> > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release > Date: 11/30/2006 > > 5:07 AM > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release > Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
