Thanks to everyone for the feedback. It was very helpful. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 6:45 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 Schema
No. I've done numerous upgrades in this scenario. It takes like five minutes. There's a known issue someone here will/probably has commented on with SFU I believe but other than that its good. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] R2 Schema I have a customer that is really pushing to have the R2 schema loaded in our W2K3 SP1 environment. The plan is to take advantage of the new DFS extensions. We don't have any plans to upgrade to R2 in the foreseeable future so we'd basically be running W2K3 with the R2 schema for several months or years. Does anyone see any potential issues with that? List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx
