I used ActiveMQ 4.0 M4 Release James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Which version of 4.0 are you testing? FWIW we've only recently started tuning 4.x heavily, certainly SVN HEAD is looking quite good.
On 4/22/06, reza aliakbary wrote: > Hello, > > I used a simple benchmark to compare the performance of 3.2.2 vs 4.0 . I > suprised why 3.2.2 performs very better than 4.0, I thought I could be wrong > or maybe my configuration has a problem but I couldn't find anything bad in > configurations(I used default and without persistency). I have attached > codes that I used. Please let me know why 3.2.2 performs better than 4.0. > The benchmark works with a queue asynchronously. > Run the consumer to register consumers and them run the producer. > > Best Regards, > Reza > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
