James.Strachan wrote: > > On 6/8/06, Christopher G. Stach II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> James Strachan wrote: >> > Note that the client side reliable:// in AMQ3 and failover:// in AMQ4 >> > (BTW it was renamed in 4 to make it explicit what it does - failover >> > to a new connection, thats all) -purely does client side reconnection >> > - it does not implement HA clustering where messages are replicated to >> > multiple brokers in case one fails and you loose the disk; only >> > Master/Slave does that - which is a broker-side configuration. >> > >> > Though store/forward and Master/Slave depends on the client using >> failover. >> >> What happens when a client hiccups and does failover to the slave, but >> all of the other clients are still using the master? > > The slave doesn't accept new connections until the master fails. > What happens if the slave and a client hiccups and thinks the master has failed?
Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Un-reliable%3A---network-of-AMQ-brokers-with-Lingo-t1744760.html#a4828428 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
