James.Strachan wrote: > > Yes. Ultimately we'd like a quorum based system where you could have a > cluster of N nodes, say N=3 so that so long as 2 broker nodes are > communicating, you are fine and the 1 broker node that can't see > anyone else would shut down - then you can handle network splits OK. > > Until we get there I'd recommend running clients on different machines > to the master/slave broker unless you are prepared to handle network > splits manually when they occur. >
Has there been any design work on doing this, or (more importantly) on automatic replication of state between brokers such that a master can become a slave to the (old) slave when it comes back up (so that it would actually be possible to use it in a HA system). Has there been any designs/brainstorms on how this synchronization should occour/the appropraite data gathered? Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Un-reliable%3A---network-of-AMQ-brokers-with-Lingo-t1744760.html#a4828810 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
