Hello James, > Are you running the broker in the same JVM as the server? That helps > reduce the latency
First I had this scenario: Machine A: Lingo Server, Lingo Client and ActiveMQ in three JVMS => throughput 200 Lingo request per second Then I had this scenario: Machine A: Lingo Server and ActiveMQ in two JVMS Machine B: Lingo Client => throughput 4.5 Lingo request per second So running an own broker in the server JVM to reduce the latency is a good idea. But in both scenarios I had the Lingo server and ActiveMQ on the same machine and the decrease from 200 to 4 requests can not be a problem between server and ActiveMQ. Only the client moved to machine B. Do you agree? Regards, Bernhard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Lingo-performance-tf2473875.html#a6899515 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
