Hello Javier, Sorry, it was not my intention to make waves. I just want that the whole issue is taken seriously:
A) If the clustering/network or brokers feature is stable, then the documentation and the support via the mailing list are not good enough. B) If the hints (my tests, number of mails for this feature and quality and quantity of answers) are correct and the feature is not in a production state, then the ActiveMQ developer should face this and warn the users on the homepage. At least option A or B is true (and for you I hope it is option A) .... Regardless whether A or B is true, the whole issue is not good for the trust in ActiveMQ. One question: did you ever start/stop brokers and consumer/producer in the network during your tests. Did all broker and consumer/producer reliable reconnect and where all message delivered? Regards, Bernd > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Javier Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 09:05 > An: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Network of brokers > > On 12/21/06, Bernhard Wellhöfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Prashanth, > > > > I agree that the clustering/network or brokers feature is > not ready for a productive scenario. The problem is that the > ActiveMQ homepage does not warn you about this case. > Therefore again and again people waste time by trying out > this feature - as each new mail for this issue to the mailing > list proves. It's a pity that this as a whole makes ActiveMQ > less trustworthy... > > > > Is this totally true ??? > > I've an application that use network of brokers ready to go to test. > I've configured it with the help of this list and nobody told > me what you say... > > If this is true I'll be in big problems after four months of > development with this product. I can´t believe it ! > > If this is true I'm a dead man... :( > > > -- > Javier Leyba > Barcelona - Spain > http://blog.leyba.com.ar >
