On 12/21/06, Bernhard Wellhöfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One question: did you ever start/stop brokers and consumer/producer in the network during your tests. Did all broker and consumer/producer reliable reconnect and where all message delivered?
As far as I remember, yes. I started trying Joram because I've been using Jonas as AS but I discarded it because the High Availability of Joram/Jonas was so "naif" and not usefull for me. After this I decided to test ActiveMQ and I remember I did a test as follows: Two JBoss server with one master broker and a slave broker (working with topics). Each master server connecting to a network of brokers with static ip's and failover (I can't use multicast) and many clients subscribed to topis with a failover url pointing (ordered, not random) to first JBoss server master broker, first JBoss server slave broker, second JBoss server master broker, second JBoss server slave broker. I remember I did a test like this: 1 - start all brokers 2 - start a subscriber 3 - send a message 4 - stop first master broker 5 - send a message 6 - stop slave broker 7 - send a message and it worked find. I guess I did more tests in this way and it worked so I thought network of brokers worked and continue with my development. Nevertheless, I asked more than once for recommendation about how to set a network of brokers and nobody answered me... I hope to hear soon somebody from ActiveMQ project with the truth about this matter. If this is not working I think we deserve to know it NOW. -- Javier Leyba Barcelona - Spain http://blog.leyba.com.ar
