Hi andrew,
could you raise a jira issue for this please: http://
issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa
cheers,
Rob
On 29 Jan 2007, at 19:03, asteele wrote:
I really like the peer transport in ActiveMQ. It seems to be just
the kind
of setup we need. However, we do have low round-trip latency
requirements
in some applications. I was seeing unacceptably bad latencies
(~200ms) for
synchronous round trips. I installed Wireshark and performed network
analysis to see what was going on. It appeared to be a Nagle
algorithm /
TCP ACK delay issue. Essentially, after the first message request and
reply, the next request message may be delayed while waiting for a
delayed
ACK from the other broker. This should be resolvable by enabling
tcpNoDelay. However, the peer transport URI provides no mechanism
to enable
tcpNoDelay. In fact, I went into the source code and found that
the TCP
network connecter specified in the PeerTransportFactory is hard
coded to
tcp://localhost:0. Basically, I need a way to turn on tcpNoDelay
in peer
transport. Thanks.
Andrew Steele
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-need-a-way-to-
set-tcpNoDelay-on-peer-transport-TCP-network-connections-
tf3137715.html#a8695603
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.