done: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1143
rajdavies wrote: > > Hi andrew, > > could you raise a jira issue for this please: http:// > issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa > > > cheers, > > Rob > On 29 Jan 2007, at 19:03, asteele wrote: > >> >> I really like the peer transport in ActiveMQ. It seems to be just >> the kind >> of setup we need. However, we do have low round-trip latency >> requirements >> in some applications. I was seeing unacceptably bad latencies >> (~200ms) for >> synchronous round trips. I installed Wireshark and performed network >> analysis to see what was going on. It appeared to be a Nagle >> algorithm / >> TCP ACK delay issue. Essentially, after the first message request and >> reply, the next request message may be delayed while waiting for a >> delayed >> ACK from the other broker. This should be resolvable by enabling >> tcpNoDelay. However, the peer transport URI provides no mechanism >> to enable >> tcpNoDelay. In fact, I went into the source code and found that >> the TCP >> network connecter specified in the PeerTransportFactory is hard >> coded to >> tcp://localhost:0. Basically, I need a way to turn on tcpNoDelay >> in peer >> transport. Thanks. >> >> Andrew Steele >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-need-a-way-to- >> set-tcpNoDelay-on-peer-transport-TCP-network-connections- >> tf3137715.html#a8695603 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-need-a-way-to-set-tcpNoDelay-on-peer-transport-TCP-network-connections-tf3137715.html#a8697381 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
