lucky for me i already had expierence with VB6 hence with the Event/Class
model.

regards

remie bolte


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ActiveServerPages" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:10 PM
Subject: RE: classic asp/asp.net


> The worst problem I have getting used to C# and ASP.NET is my lack of
> knowledge of the event model, such as Initialize, Load, and Render.
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide
> /html/cpconcontrolexecutionlifecycle.asp
>
> Once I understood this, a lot of things made sense since I was used to
> working with the more procedural VBScript.  I was getting quite
> frustrated with ASP without this knowledge.
>
> I will say that working with .NET has made my classic ASP work much
> better and clearer. I work on both platforms concurrently (Maintaining
> our application and rewriting it for the next version in .NET)
>
> Rick.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Remie Bolte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:19 AM
> To: ActiveServerPages
> Subject: Re: classic asp/asp.net
>
> I can't agree with that
> I know my classic ASP as wel as my VB.NET (self tought)
> and i don't get confused by the two.
>
> altough i must say, programming in classes is much easier and readable
> then
> random scripting.
> in order to have a better understanding on working with classes, perhaps
> one
> should look into UML.
>
> Regards
>
> Remie Bolte
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ActiveServerPages" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:12 PM
> Subject: RE: classic asp/asp.net
>
>
> I think if I had the choice to start over again,  I would go directly to
> ASP.NET.  I think having known classis ASP before hand,  confuses me
> more
> when trying to learn ASP.NET.  So, you Matt,  may be at an advantage not
> having known classic ASP.  I really do need to learn it though.... Arg.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:55 AM
> Posted To: Active Server Pages
> Conversation: classic asp/asp.net
> Subject: RE: classic asp/asp.net
>
>
> I've not used Classic Asp much, but from what I know it is a procedural
> language/script, with standard functions and it is written in top-down
> format, interlaced with HTML. Most other internet languages work like
> this
> as well: ColdFusion, PERL, JSP/Servlets (except they are
> object-oriented).
> A procedural language is typically easier to learn and use.
>
> I've been working with ASP.NET for about three months now - it's a
> quantum
> leap from the standard - first code an HTML page, then put programming
> logic
> in it.
>
> .NET uses webforms, which I personally think are the greatest web
> programming enhancement ever, excepting maybe only Flash.
>
> I write HTML hardly at all now.  I concentrate on the logic, and I can
> use
> events like it's a windows form. The language is object-oriented, so
> it's
> crazy trying to find objects/methods/properties that I need sometimes,
> but
> it is SO POWERFUL. I can write complete web applications in one page
> now,
> with less than half the code of an old app.  Also, there is almost no
> interspersing the presentation code with the logic. Code behind keeps
> everything separated nicely.
>
> Learning this is a little bit trying, but I am getting faster all the
> time
> as I use it - just like with any other language.  Because I don't come
> from
> a Classic-ASP background, I might be struggling more than someone with
> that
> knowledge.  But I think it's AMAZING.
>
> When see the conversations on my old mailing lists (ColdFusion
> primarily) and they are touting the wonderfulness of their newest
> version,
> or the  problems they are having with the newest version, I read the
> messages and laugh to myself because I don't have those problems anymore
> -
> with .NET, the old problems have disappeared because this is a new
> paradigm
> in programming for the web.
>
> I highly recommend learning ASP.NET first - it's the future.
>
>
>
> Matthew Small
> IT Supervisor
> Showstopper National Dance Competitions
> 3660 Old Kings Hwy
> Murrells Inlet, SC 29576
> 843-357-1847
> http://www.showstopperonline.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: deb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:44 AM
> To: ActiveServerPages
> Subject: classic asp/asp.net
>
> Hi, I have been learning the classic asp. I have seen many discussions
> in
> regards to which is the better of the two, how difficult is it to go
> from
> the one to the other? I'd be interested to hear what you guys all have
> to
> say about this.
>
> I have recieved many opnions as to which way to go. My decision stands
> at
> learning the classic asp first. Then going on to the asp.net. Opnions
> regarding this decision are most welcome as well. thanks to all
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> %%email.unsub%%
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> %%email.unsub%%
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> %%email.unsub%%
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> %%email.unsub%%
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
%%email.unsub%%
>



---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to