The "correct" way is relative to your network. Are you currently running any VLAN's? I expect not, but better too much info than not enough.
Are you running DHCP? Are all of your clients in the same physical location? Sorry to answer your question with more questions, but there are lots of options to your problem depending on your situation. - WJR On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 14:52, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]>wrote: > **DOUBLE POST** I sent this to the NT System Admin Group too. > > > > I am in need of more IP addresses on my network. > > > > My current network looks like this: > > 192.168.1.x > > 255.255.255.0 > > > > I am using 248 IP’s currently, so I have very little expansion available. > I do see the potential to increase in the following year, so I had better > get my butt thinking about this soon. Plus I have Christmas and New Year’s > holidays that I could work with no one on our network for 3 full days. > > > > I am thinking about changing my subnet to something like 255.255.254.0 or > 255.255.252.0. Would this be a good way, or would I be better adding an > additional router and just creating a new 255.255.255.0 network on > 192.168.2.x? > > > > I guess my question is which is the “correct” way? > > > > *Jeff Johnson* > > *Systems Administrator* > > 714-773-2600 Office > > 714-773-6351 Fax > > [image: hydraflow] > > > > > > > > ~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~ > ~ ~ > > ~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=400> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
