Tucker wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 5:01 AM Jean-Pierre Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Le 17/11/2023 à 04:26, Randy Brukardt a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't really like either of these, but something better seems doesn't seem
>>> easy to come up with.
>> Or a simple swap:
>> Reason: The Streams.Storage.Bounded package is provided in order to make
>> available an alternative, which gives more predictable memory usage, to
>> the
>> Streams.Storage.Unbounded package.
>
>Seems better. I still find "is provided in order to make available an
>alternative"
>in the "department of redundancy department"...
I would have called it "verbal diarehha". :-)
>... Also, the placement of the "which" clause is still a bit awkward. How
>about:
> Reason: As an alternative to the Streams.Storage.Unbounded package, the
> Streams.Storage.Bounded package is available, which provides more
> predictable memory usage.
I think we could dispense with "available", too. And the commas if we use
"that" rather than "which". So perhaps:
Reason: The Streams.Storage.Bounded package is provided as an alternative that
gives more predictable memory usage than the Streams.Storage.Unbounded package.
Randy.
________________________________________________________
You have received this message because you subscribed to the Ada-Comment
mailing list. To leave the Ada-Comment list, send an email with
'leave Ada-Comment' in the body to [email protected]. For help
on the other commands available, send 'help Ada-Comment' to the same address.
Problems? Send mail to [email protected]. This list is operated by the
Ada Resource Association, Inc., PO Box 8685, New York NY 10116-8685.
