One fix: Not "inetnum" and "route" but "inet6num" and "route6".
19.06.2015, 15:23, "Vladimir Andreev" <vladi...@quick-soft.net>: > Another way: > > 1) Create "inetnum" with type ALLOCATED-BY-LIR inside of "inetnum" allocated > by RIPE NCC to LIR; > 2) Create "route" object with the same IP prefix as in step 1 and desired AS; > 3) Announce your prefix; > > Also you may need to create at least one ASSIGNED "inetnum" inside > ALLOCATED-BY-LIR "inetnum". > > 19.06.2015, 15:15, "Christopher Kunz" <chrisl...@de-punkt.de>: >> Am 19.06.15 um 14:06 schrieb Vladimir Andreev: >>> Hello! >>> >>> Why wouldn't they become a LIR? >> >>>> Small Hotspot providers and especially Freifunk communities typically >>>> can not afford a LIR Membership to be independent. In my opinion the >>>> current policy makes it hard to adopt IPv6 in such cases. >> >> As the OP wrote: It's too expensive for a non-profit communal >> organisation (typically made up of 3-10 enthusiastic community members >> without a real budget) to become a LIR just for the purpose of >> connecting one (!) city's Wifi to the world. >> >> --ck > > -- > With best regards, Vladimir Andreev > General director, QuickSoft LLC > Tel: +7 903 1750503 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
