Thanks Randy, below is what you wrote on Apri 15:
>i do not support pigs at the last /8 trough >the purpose of the single last /8 allocation was to allow NEW ENTRY. >pigs coming back to the trough every 18 months is not new anything. >randy can you please tell me what you meant from "last /8 allocation" there? Cheers, Arash Naderpour P.S my understanding from 2015-05 is that it divides the current pool into 2 separate parts, last allocation of /8 and additional free IP pool received from IANA. -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2016 11:44 AM To: Arash Naderpour <[email protected]> Cc: RIPE address policy WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision) you may find reading the actual last /8 policy informative. > Last /8 is not really get affected by this policy. > - Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address space > outside 185/8 this is misleading or just sadly misinformed last /8 is not an address range, it is a state reached once the ncc had only that address range and continues on irrespective of additions or subtractions of space to the ncc's pool. randy
