That's not true, I know some LIRs qualified for /22 not requesting it and they are not running on auto-pilot (there are fully aware of the market situation)
Arash On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:13 AM, David Monosov <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be completely irrational for any LIR that qualifies for > additional IPv4 > space not to request it. > > Any LIRs not having done so yet despite qualifying are likely running on > auto-pilot in the enterprise world or are prevented from doing so by > organizational red tape of some sort. > > There is undoubtedly a price point at which instead of the e-mails from > would-be > IPv4 brokers currently circulating that solicit LIRs to sell or lease > unadvertised / unused space, LIRs will begin receiving e-mails from the > same > brokers with the subject line "Did you know you qualify for additional IP > space > you could sell at a considerable profit? We can help!". > > I suspect Remco's back-of-a-napkin calculations are actually incredibly > conservative, and would like to reiterate my objection to 2015-05 and any > future > policy aiming to loosen the allocation criteria of the remaining crumbs of > IPv4. > > Seeking to maximize the return on one's LIR fees is a perfectly rational > expression of self-interest, but it is hardly a demonstration of > responsible > custodianship of the future of the Internet. > > -- > Respectfully yours, > > David Monosov > > On 12/05/16 00:06, Remco van Mook wrote: > > > > There won't be space for newcomers in there. > > > > Remco > > > >
