I don’t think the regulator is forbidding using a 6in4 tunnel because LI regulation, otherwise, they will not allow any kind of VPN, etc?
Saludos, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: address-policy-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Arash Naderpour <[email protected]> Responder a: <[email protected]> Fecha: domingo, 12 de junio de 2016, 19:36 Para: 'Jim Reid' <[email protected]> CC: 'RIPE Address Policy WG List' <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment >Hi Jim, > >Agree here with you, this is not appropriate to discuss how to exploit the >existing gaps here in APWG, I was just trying to explain that technical >difficulties are not the only reason IPv6 is not deployed everywhere. It >should be first be available and possible (from legal point of view) to deploy >it which is not yet in all area. > >Regards, > >Arash Naderpour > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jim Reid [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 2:15 AM >To: Arash Naderpour <[email protected]> >Cc: RIPE Address Policy WG List <[email protected]> >Subject: IPv6 connectivity in Iran > > >> On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:30, Arash Naderpour <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As an example in Iran there is only one exit point (AS12880 and AS48159 >> belongs to one organization) from country to global carriers controlled by >> government and as they have no LI platform yet on IPv6 there is simply no >> IPv6 service availability or possibility for Iranian service providers. >> >> There is no possibility to have a direct peering with a global carrier and >> as a result no native IPv6 connectivity yet. there is also no IXP in the >> country. > >Well that lack of IPv6 appears to be a major gap in the market and a >worthwhile business opportunity with huge growth potential. So is the lack of >an in-country IXP. IMO it’s up to the Iranian Internet community to tackle >these issues and make the most of these business opporrtunities. It is >probably inappropriate for this WG to discuss how to exploit these gaps. They >can’t really be helped (or hindered) by RIPE address policy anyway. Mind you >if anyone is minded to set up an IXP in Iran, they will have to move quickly >if they need/want some IPv4 from the NCC for local interconnect and peering. > >PS: Apologies for a meaningful and relevant Subject: header. > > > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
