When a resource is scarce, either you define a high-enough price (GSM frequencies for instance) or you enforce a policy on how it's used. The issue is that even if you free 2 or 3 /8 from 240/4 or DoD, that's still a scarce resource, given the current growth and the forthcoming IoT invasion.
David Ponzone > Le 13 juin 2016 à 19:09, NTX NOC <n...@ntx.ru> a écrit : > > Not correct. My opinion is that all IPs space should be completely free > for all members. It's like letters in the alphabet. You should not pay > for letters, you should not pay for your unique name+surname (symbols > that allow to identify you like IP address numbers). > > So to allow progress to come in we need to use abilities, that we have, > reasonably. And here I asked about reserved IPv4 space. > > I am here in this discussions because we try to help people to get IP > space easy and faster. And I am show here that there a lot of space that > could be used. > > Yuri > >> On 11.06.2016 22:33, Sergey wrote: >> Agree with Mikael. This is not a provocative question, but are NTX so >> worried about this proposal because it would affect their businesses >> selling and leasing IPv4 space? Their webpage mentions it at the top. >> >> The IP addresses aren't here to sell them. They're to be routed and >> used. This is just a tool. The IPv6 deployment is the only solution. > > > > *********************************************************************************************************** > Le service MailSecure d'IPeva confirme l'absence de virus et de spam dans ce > message. > *********************************************************************************************************** > >
