Hi Gert, Gert Doering wrote:
[...] > Right now, there are two different shades of "PI colour" - "real PI" > and "not really real PI". The first shade has the full obligations and > protection of 2007-01 - namely, a contractual relationship (via a > sponsoring LIR) with the NCC that clearly identifies who has "rights" > to that prefix. The other shade is also labeled "PI", but whether or > not contracts exist, and who is the legitimate holder, is less well > defined. Can you please expand on this? What are the risks that registrants of "not really real PI" face? Andrea's slide included a bullet stating that: "Many LIRs do not have contact with ASSIGNED PI customers anymore" Should I understand that to mean that there is a risk the LIR could take back the assignment? Kind regards, Leo Vegoda
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
