Greetings,
While the proposal's title seems to be a positive approach, as i read it, its main goal is to add extra requirements for LRH by changing «RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders».
I think protection (or just better alarms in place!) for Legacy address space is a good thing, however, i'm not sure an extra workload for the NCC and the LRH in the case they want to transfer their asset(s) is the way to go.
I also agree with Sascha Luck's previous comment about LRH having to submit to an extra verification process.
In its current terms, i also object to this proposal. Best Regards, Carlos Friaças On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues, A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2017-01, "Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates" is now available for discussion. The goal of this proposal is to require the RIPE NCC to publish all changes to the holdership of legacy resources in the existing transfer statistics. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2017-01 As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer. At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal. We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <[email protected]> before 24 May 2017. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
