Hi, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:20:31PM +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote: > If there is no gap in the policies and what you are proposing is service, why > was this introduced to the Address Policy WG? The charter for the RIPE NCC > Services Working Group makes it clear that it is the home for discussions > about the introduction of new services and tools > (https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services).
The AP and NCC Services WG chairs debated this, and it's "sitting on the fence" - legacy stuff / NCC services obviously go to the NCC Services WG, but since it was felt that APWG "owns" the transfer policy document, which is potentially subject to change here, the proposal ended here. We've sent a heads up to the NCC Service WG so they are informed. Gert -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
