Randy Bush wrote: > did it say anything about price? i missed that? i did not think > the AP WG dealt with pricing; so it would be pretty strange.
You're correct in saying that APWG does not deal with pricing, but it's a bit jesuitical not to acknowledge that the practical impact of this policy change will be a dramatic increase in RIR-allocated ipv4 addresses. > but we can postpone the inevitable so folk have time to get in > the lifeboats. There is no amount of time that will be enough. > so do we want to do it in a controlled and managed fashion or > chaotically? I genuinely don't think that this proposal will impact much on this either way. Nick
