Re: [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

[Randy Bush]

>>> They are beyond help
>> 
>> not at all.  the vendors are more than happy to sell them CGNs, and
>> other NATs of many flavors.
> 
> Sorry, I should have specified "from a IPv4 allocation policy point of
> view" :)

sorry.  but having spent blood and tears on ipv6 deployment for over 20
years, watching ipv6 zealots create a massive NAT market really really
hurts.

randy