+1 (although I thought somebody was actually using this feature) Jarek
> -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Reference properties / params > > > Hi Addressers, > > It looks like currently we do this thing in > AddressingHeaders.processReferenceProperty() (line 590 or so) where if > we have a null list of refP Qnames that we're looking for, we mark ALL > non-WSA headers as reference properties and process them all.... > > This seems like a remarkably bad thing. I'm going to remove this > behavior (and only mark reference properties / parameters that are > explicitly specified) unless someone objects. Is there some > good reason > for this? > > Thanks, > --Glen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
