+1 On 1/13/06, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 (although I thought somebody was actually using this feature) > > Jarek > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:19 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Reference properties / params > > > > > > Hi Addressers, > > > > It looks like currently we do this thing in > > AddressingHeaders.processReferenceProperty() (line 590 or so) where if > > we have a null list of refP Qnames that we're looking for, we mark ALL > > non-WSA headers as reference properties and process them all.... > > > > This seems like a remarkably bad thing. I'm going to remove this > > behavior (and only mark reference properties / parameters that are > > explicitly specified) unless someone objects. Is there some > > good reason > > for this? > > > > Thanks, > > --Glen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
