Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
> Ok, see my attached patch. But can we assume in all cases that ipipe_tsc2ns
> is
> used with a value smaller than a long long variable? The only usage of this
> macro so far is in __ipipe_print_delay() which calls it with a substraction
> of two unsigned long long variables.
The patch using do_div also assumes that t * 1000 will never overflow 64
bits. But I agree, it is less restrictive.
>>What value is a 64 bits when it fails,
>>__ipipe_mach_ticks_per_jiffy or t ?
>
>
> Sorry, I'm not really sure what you mean here.
Forget it, I got the answer, it is t that is a 64 bits value.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix
_______________________________________________
Adeos-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
