Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Sebastian Smolorz wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, see my attached patch. But can we assume in all cases that
>>>ipipe_tsc2ns is used with a value smaller than a long long variable? The
>>>only usage of this macro so far is in __ipipe_print_delay() which calls
>>>it with a substraction of two unsigned long long variables.
>>
>>The patch using do_div also assumes that t * 1000 will never overflow 64
>>bits. But I agree, it is less restrictive.
>>
>>
>>>>What value is a 64 bits when it fails,
>>>>__ipipe_mach_ticks_per_jiffy or t ?
>>>
>>>Sorry, I'm not really sure what you mean here.
>>
>>Forget it, I got the answer, it is t that is a 64 bits value.
>
>
> So which patch are you going to check in?
I have no preference, maybe Philippe has one ?
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix
_______________________________________________
Adeos-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
