On 7/14/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I'm lost in the to-and-fro's of podling, merging tomahawk, etc. Was anything decided? Where do you want this stuff to go, or do we work alone until we have something ready?
not yet. The merge is not a "from day to day" thing. For now, we don't have a solution for that stuff. Matt
D. On 7/8/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does the Dojo datepicker support internationalization? This is a > must-have. > I tried switching my browser to French but it still came up in English. > > Also, I'd be -1 on adding something if it couldn't support Trinidad > skinning. > > -- Adam > > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How do you call this ? > > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html > <http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html> > > > > On 7/8/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar so > > far! > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > cool to hear martin, > > > > > > > > what's up, should we both take a look at dojo? > > > > (the xml way)? > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of the > current > > > > > tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the same or > > better > > > > > functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk as > > well. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > More... > > > > > > > > > > > > at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's with the > > tobago > > > > > > code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for all these > three > > libs. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Moving to dev..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good idea > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the inability of some > > users to > > > > > > > > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't be driving > the > > > > > > > > development decisions of a podling. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The need to have a popup calendar looks like a perfect trial > > run of > > > > > > > > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate to see someone go > out > > and > > > > > > > > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet another time when > > we've > > > > > > > > already got two or three of them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of that. > > > > > > > We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel free to add > > content. > > > > > > > (see [1]). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Realistically, merging the two is probably going to be more > a > > matter > > > > > > > > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad than the > other > > way > > > > > > > > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing over semantics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance has already > > > > > > > *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also some goodies. > > This > > > > > > > task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some reasons user's won't / > > can't use > > > > > > > > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production. I think that > was > > the reason > > > > > > > > > for this thread. Creating a custom one on top of the > > Trinidad Podling > > > > > > > > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff, we should take a > look > > at Dojo > > > > > > > > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that they have now "xml > > namespaces", > > > > > > > > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead of *hacking* JS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know some projects, that are not allowed to use MyFaces; > > they stick > > > > > > > > > with IBM or the RI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html<http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Could someone refresh my memory? Was the eventual goal > to > > merge > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup Calendar > rather > > than making > > > > > > > > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars play nice with > > Trinidad is a > > > > > > > > > > step in the wrong direction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on the eventual goal for > > these two libraries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It would definitely be of interest! (IMO, it would > need > > to > > > > > > > > > > > handle internationalization and localization - I'd > like > > to keep Trinidad > > > > > > > > > > > consistent in this regard.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt to see if there is interest in > > such a feature. We may > > > > > > > > > > > > have capacity to contribute. I see this being > > rendered in 'inaccessible' > > > > > > > > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead of the window'ed calendar > - > > thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst. We're really trying not to stray > from > > Trinidad as a core > > > > > > > > > > > > > library. However, I do like the look of the > > Tomahawk version, so that > > > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > > > make a very good start. I guess I'm looking for > > guidance as to where > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fit and how it would be configured - and > > indeed if people think > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad needs one! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a calendar with a JS-Popup mode in the > > tomahawk-component > > > > > > > > > > > > > > library. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you can use this one, or at least if you > > want to implement > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar in trinidad learn from this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in a 3rd calendar mode > > whereby it popsup a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript calendar, rather than just the > inline > > and windowed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > versions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, is there one out there that people > would > > like to see as the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which to build? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > futher stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > -- Chordiant Software Inc. www.chordiant.com
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
