OK, thanks Martin. In general, I would totally agree with Mike that we should be aggressively looking at proposals for added functionality in Trinidad and Tomahawk to reduce duplicate effort and duplicate components.
-- Adam On 7/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Prepare it for Trinidad - I'll have a look at it when it's finished, and will take it over for tomahawk if I like it! regards, Martin On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/14/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, I'm lost in the to-and-fro's of podling, merging tomahawk, etc. > > Was anything decided? Where do you want this stuff to go, or do we work > > alone until we have something ready? > > not yet. The merge is not a "from day to day" thing. > For now, we don't have a solution for that stuff. > > Matt > > > D. > > > > > > On 7/8/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Does the Dojo datepicker support internationalization? This is a > > > must-have. > > > I tried switching my browser to French but it still came up in English. > > > > > > Also, I'd be -1 on adding something if it couldn't support Trinidad > > > skinning. > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > How do you call this ? > > > > > > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html > > > < http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html> > > > > > > > > On 7/8/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar so > > > > far! > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > cool to hear martin, > > > > > > > > > > > > what's up, should we both take a look at dojo? > > > > > > (the xml way)? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of the > > > current > > > > > > > tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the same or > > > > better > > > > > > > functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > More... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's with the > > > > tobago > > > > > > > > code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for all these > > > three > > > > libs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Moving to dev..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good idea > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the inability of some > > > > users to > > > > > > > > > > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't be driving > > > the > > > > > > > > > > development decisions of a podling. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The need to have a popup calendar looks like a perfect trial > > > > run of > > > > > > > > > > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate to see someone go > > > out > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet another time when > > > > we've > > > > > > > > > > already got two or three of them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of that. > > > > > > > > > We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel free to add > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > (see [1]). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Realistically, merging the two is probably going to be more > > > a > > > > matter > > > > > > > > > > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad than the > > > other > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing over semantics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance has already > > > > > > > > > *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also some goodies. > > > > This > > > > > > > > > task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some reasons user's won't / > > > > can't use > > > > > > > > > > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production. I think that > > > was > > > > the reason > > > > > > > > > > > for this thread. Creating a custom one on top of the > > > > Trinidad Podling > > > > > > > > > > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff, we should take a > > > look > > > > at Dojo > > > > > > > > > > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that they have now "xml > > > > namespaces", > > > > > > > > > > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead of *hacking* JS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know some projects, that are not allowed to use MyFaces; > > > > they stick > > > > > > > > > > > with IBM or the RI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html< http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone refresh my memory? Was the eventual goal > > > to > > > > merge > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup Calendar > > > rather > > > > than making > > > > > > > > > > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars play nice with > > > > Trinidad is a > > > > > > > > > > > > step in the wrong direction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on the eventual goal for > > > > these two libraries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would definitely be of interest! (IMO, it would > > > need > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle internationalization and localization - I'd > > > like > > > > to keep Trinidad > > > > > > > > > > > > > consistent in this regard.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt to see if there is interest in > > > > such a feature. We may > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have capacity to contribute. I see this being > > > > rendered in 'inaccessible' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead of the window'ed calendar > > > - > > > > thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst. We're really trying not to stray > > > from > > > > Trinidad as a core > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > library. However, I do like the look of the > > > > Tomahawk version, so that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make a very good start. I guess I'm looking for > > > > guidance as to where > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fit and how it would be configured - and > > > > indeed if people think > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad needs one! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a calendar with a JS-Popup mode in the > > > > tomahawk-component > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > library. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you can use this one, or at least if you > > > > want to implement > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar in trinidad learn from this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in a 3rd calendar mode > > > > whereby it popsup a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript calendar, rather than just the > > > inline > > > > and windowed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > versions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, is there one out there that people > > > would > > > > like to see as the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which to build? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > futher stuff: > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Chordiant Software Inc. > > www.chordiant.com > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
