as said ExternalContext is not possible. MyFacesContext isn't exsisting.
-Matthias On 7/14/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I *DON'T* like ExternalContext because in a piece of code that uses both, you'll have to qualify the class with a package name. Never a good idea in my book. What about something cheezy like MyFacesContext? Does MyFaces already have a class like this? Günther wrote: > Hi! > > >> More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext. >> Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution. >> Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext. >> >> ExternalContext might be a good name... >> but... as we all know, this is already taken :) >> > > What about TrinidadRealm? ;-) > No, but why would ExternalContext be better then TrinidadContext? > Thanx for your patience if this happens to be a stupid question to ask. > > Regards, > Thorsten > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Matthias Wessendorf > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 23:49 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [Proposal] (re)naming issue > > Hey, > > since we closed ADFFACES-4 it is now time to start the renaming of the > packages, since ADF is a no no. > > ADF-FACES-API > package > from > org.apache.myfaces.adf.** > > to > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.** > > ADF-FACES-IMPL > package > from > org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.** > > to > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.** > (note trinidad DOT internal) > > More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext. > Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution. > Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext. > > ExternalContext might be a good name... > but... as we all know, this is already taken :) > > Any ideas? > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
