> More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext. What about TrinidadRealm? ;-) No, but why would ExternalContext be better then TrinidadContext?
TrinidadContext *sounds* like only useful for Trinidad. This *concept* might be nice to be used outside of T. -Matthias
Thanx for your patience if this happens to be a stupid question to ask. Regards, Thorsten -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Matthias Wessendorf Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 23:49 An: [email protected] Betreff: [Proposal] (re)naming issue Hey, since we closed ADFFACES-4 it is now time to start the renaming of the packages, since ADF is a no no. ADF-FACES-API package from org.apache.myfaces.adf.** to org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.** ADF-FACES-IMPL package from org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.** to org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.** (note trinidad DOT internal) More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext. Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution. Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext. ExternalContext might be a good name... but... as we all know, this is already taken :) Any ideas? -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
