I assume this applies similarly to plugins? So we should rename, for instance, maven-faces-plugin to trinidad-faces-plugin.
-- Adam On 7/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a "usage of javax.***" restriction :) We will take care of that. Thanks! myfaces-archetype-trinidad sounds not well same for myfaces-archetype-tomahawk maybe we should use tomahawk-archetype-starter or simple tomahawk-archetype and trinidad ... and tobago ... :) > I got confirmation from Brett on [EMAIL PROTECTED] that the naming convention > should be <projectname>-archetype-<description>. > > In other words, the ones named maven-archetype-* are the ones that are > distributed *by* Maven as a project. > > Thanks, > Wendy > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
