regarding 1) I wouldn't change the DWRServlet, hard to maintain... just create your own filter that does the same like the FacesServlet.
4,5) yeah can be tricky :) Good luck ;) On 10/5/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it works, the result will be consistent in any environment. What I'm unsure about is the feasibility in a short time in an easy way. Let me enumerate the technical difficulties I see, maybe they willappear trivial to you: 1. Get a FacesContext instance. Fix: Change DWRServlet code a bit to instanciate the FacesContext. Main difficulty: I don't know if FacesContextFactory will like the XMLRequest format of AJAX, it's possible that it don't whine at all though. If that's the case, this point is not a real issue. 2. Get a RequestContext instance. Fix: Add AdfFilter to DWRServlet. Main difficulty: None connected directly to this point. 3. Use the dialog feature of RequestContext. Difficulty: None 4. Open the dialog, e.g. how do you manage the callback method? Difficulty: Dialog is based on some internal Trinidad JS and PPR code that will call a window.open instead refreshing the page. With DWR you'll most likely need to do that yourself, but I'm not perfectly sure on that point. I know the dialog framework, but I'm not a guru. 5. Managing return event. Fix: I have no clue, it might works like magic, but I never used dialog framework that way. If you try it an it works, I would be glad to hear it though. Regards, ~ Simon On 10/5/06, Anthony Yulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Im planning to do this on a production environment. Nightmarish? So > you're > saying that this is not adviseable to implement this on a production > environment? What do you mean nightmarish? The results will not be > consistent? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DWR and ADF Faces > > Using DWR to do that will be nightmarish I think... You'll need a > TrinidadContext instance as well to push the dialog... > > Hmmm I think this could be a nice improvement for Trinidad though, an > attribute to send an action from any JavaScript event. Maybe a keyword > placed in the event attributes, or new attributes altogether. All > components > implementing that would have to also implement ActionSource/ActionSource 2 > though. This is not a small change, but it would open a whole new level of > functionality. > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > > > On 10/5/06, Anthony Yulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well I know the launchDialog function gets called so I know that the DWR > > is > > working and that I can all java code from the javascript. However, the > > popup window is not showing and that the browser is issuing an alertbox > > with > > message: "null". And, Simon said that as long as you don't use the > > FacesContext's instance, it will be fine. But here I am using the > > FacesContext. > > > > > > Here is the actual code: > > > > public void launchDialog() { > > > > System.out.println("Launch Dialog called."); > > FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance(); > > > > ViewHandler viewHandler = context.getApplication > > ().getViewHandler(); > > > > UIViewRoot dialog = viewHandler.createView(context, > > "/pages/iv/dialogPage.jsp"); > > > > > > HashMap properties = new HashMap(); > > properties.put("width", new Integer(250)); > > properties.put("height", new Integer(150)); > > > > > > > > AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance > > ().launchDialog(dialog,properties,null,tru > > e,properties); > > System.out.println("after launch" + componentId); > > > > > > } > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matthias Wessendorf > > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:08 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: DWR and ADF Faces > > > > what was the result of that? > > > > or haven't you tried? > > > > > > > > On 10/5/06, Anthony Yulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually what I want is to launch a dialog when the onfocus() event > > fires. > > > > > > I am getting the FacesContext Instance on the method that is called by > > the > > > javascript so that will pose a problem? > > > > > > > > > <af:inputText ... onfocus=FocusFunction() /> > > > ... > > > ... > > > ... > > > > > > // > > > function FocusFunction() { > > > > > > BackingBean.launchDialog(); > > > } > > > > > > ... > > > ... > > > ... > > > public void launchDialog() { > > > FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance(); > > > ... > > > ... > > > ... > > > > > > } > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:41 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: DWR and ADF Faces > > > > > > I did not try it, but I don't see any reason why it would not work > > though, > > > as long as you don't need a FacesContext instance in your DWR method. > If > > you > > > do, it might get hellish. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > On 10/5/06, Anthony Yulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone tried to integrate DWR with ADF Faces? > > > > > > > > *************The information transmitted is intended only for the > > person > > > > or > > > > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > > > > privileged material. Any review,retransmission,dissemination or > other > > use > > > > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by > > persons > > > > or > > > > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > > received > > > > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material > from > > any > > > > computer.********************* > > > > > > > > > > > *************The information transmitted is intended only for the > person > > or > > > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > > > privileged material. Any review,retransmission,dissemination or other > > use > > > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by > > persons > > or > > > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > > received > > > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from > > any > > > computer.********************* > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > *************The information transmitted is intended only for the person > > or > > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > > privileged material. Any review,retransmission,dissemination or other > use > > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by > persons > > or > > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > received > > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from > any > > computer.********************* > > > *************The information transmitted is intended only for the person > or > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. Any review,retransmission,dissemination or other use > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons > or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer.********************* >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
