You'd also need to add generated code for saveState()/restoreState().

In theory, we might not need a flag - you might be able to go
up the ComponentBean hierarchy, looking at superclasses, to
see if UIXComponentBase is in there.

-- Adam


On 10/28/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ah, and I forgot:

  d. Do not generate the protected constructor that accepts the
renderType as a parameter

Cheers,

Bruno

On 10/28/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I have been playing with the maven-faces-plugin from the 1.2
> branch to adapt it to generate the components for myfaces.
>
> What I have identified so far is: As the component superclass must be
> javax.faces.UIComponentBase we need that the generated components:
>      a. Do not call super(rendererType) in the constructor. Instead
> call setRendererType(rendererType)
>      b. Do not use FacesBean.TYPE. Don't generate then the method
> getBeanType and don't generate the static TYPE.lockAndRegister thing.
>      c. Do not user PropertyKey.  The accessor methods for the
> properties would not call methods from the superclass
>
> We could have then, a specific parameter in the configuration of the
> plugin to toggle this behaviour. I think that, a part from this,
> everything would be generated ok when we write all the xml files for
> the components. This plugin does great work.
>
> Do you think I am missing something or do you have better ideas?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>
> On 10/26/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/26/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to understand in detaild the maven-faces-plugin usage.
Is
> > > there any documentation? I am evaluating the amount of work needed
if
> > > we follow the same way than trinidad to generate  tags, config
files,
> > > etc...
> >
> >
> > There'd need to be support added for generating components and
> > tags that inherit from UIComponentBase and UIComponentELTag
> > instead of UIXComponentBase and UIXComponentELTag.  That'd
> > be rather easy to do, if a bit tedious.
> >
> > I'd be very happy to help point interested developers in the right
> > direction.
> >
> > Also the intention is to generate the taglibs 1.2 for myfaces 1.2,
> > > with the deferred-value/method attributes etc. Up to what extent
this
> > > is possible with the current implementation of the plugin?
> >
> >
> > Support for generating JSP 2.1 - including deferred-value,
> > method-expression, etc. - is already in on the JSF 1.2 branch
> > of Trinidad.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to