Of course, this only covers high risk projects that are completely seperable from the main line and don't require modifications there.
-- Adam On 12/14/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first and allow them to ferment a bit without effecting the main line. I like it! +1 (non-binding) Adam Winer wrote: > On 12/14/06, Danny Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 (non binding). >> >> Q1 - Would this add more workload to those with Commit priviledge, or >> could >> we open up the commit access a little more for this project? > > I don't think there is any process for a less-restrictive commit > access for one portion of the product. My understanding > is that a committer is a committer is a committer... Someone > with more detailed ASF expertise can confirm. > > -- Adam > > > >> >> On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel >> directory >> > to trinidad and plugins. This'd give us a place to add more >> substantial >> > contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them >> > time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before >> moving >> > in to the main libraries. It'd also give me a chance for >> committers like >> > me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the >> > trunk >> > immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for >> > multi-component validation, for example). >> > >> > Feedback? +1 from me. ;) >> > >> > -- Adam >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Chordiant Software Inc. >> www.chordiant.com >> >> >
