yeah, if others agree, I will create *branch* for that and play with Danny's contribution.
@Danny: do you already have signed the CLA ? Contact me offline if you have questions on that -M On 12/19/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally like the latter.. Unfortunately very few things can be developed in a Vacuume. At the very least it should have it's own copy of impl. Scott Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Looks like all here have already agreed on that one. > What do you have in mind? > a *separate* project with trinidad-api/-impl as dependency, > where we can "test" components like the popup from danny? > > Or a *branch* that really acts as a sandbox to "play" with ideas on > components > and when stable (or close to it) the stuff get's merged into _core_ ? > > -M > > On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel >> directory >> to trinidad and plugins. This'd give us a place to add more substantial >> contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them >> time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before >> moving >> in to the main libraries. It'd also give me a chance for committers >> like >> me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the >> trunk >> immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for >> multi-component validation, for example). >> >> Feedback? +1 from me. ;) >> >> -- Adam >> > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
