I just pinged the maven list.
Looks like the Source plugin has the javadoc jar containing the mentioned files
-M
On 2/20/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sources and javadoc probably don't reuse that information and to be honest I
don't know how well the
source-plugin and javadoc-plugin is configurable with this (have to dig into
this)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> I will add the src/site thing. But in the meantime, I have these question:
> Why is the source-plugin adding the target/ ?
> Why is this:
>
> <build>
> <resources>
> <resource>
> <directory>src/main/resources</directory>
> </resource>
> <!-- also include license and notice files in all the jars -->
> <resource>
> <directory>${basedir}/</directory>
> <includes>
> <include>NOTICE.txt</include>
> <include>LICENSE.txt</include>
> <include>INCUBATOR_NOTICE.txt</include>
> </includes>
> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
> </resource>
> </resources>
>
> not applied to the javadoc/sources plugin ?
>
> thx,
> M
>
> On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay (board report time)..
>>
>> - Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an exclude
>> of that specifically)
>> - Source jar src/site don't contain licenses
>> - Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license (since javadoc is
>> generated the html doesn't
>> need apache headers)
>>
>>
>> Not blocking :
>>
>> In the MANIFEST.MF file I am missing the version of the plugin (for
>> the trinidad core a lot more
>> important) and also the build version is 1.5. Don't know if that is
>> the target / needed ? (afaik
>> trinidad core is 1.5)
>>
>> If you fix the source and javadoc I am +1 :)
>>
>> Sorry for the tough crowd. On the other hand : if you get it right
>> once, you should be able to get
>> it right everywhere :)
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I finally managed to get some release artifacts published to a "stage
>> > repo". I used my private Apache account for that ([1]).
>> >
>> > Please take a look at the "1.0.0-incubating" artifacts and vote if we
>> > should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------
>> > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
>> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> > and why..............
>> > ------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
