I don't mind having it in the the META-INF directory btw..

Mvgr,
Martin

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hey Martin,
> 
> is there a need that we need to have the NOTICE, LICENSE and
> INCUBATOR.TXT in $basedir} ?
> 
> When moving them to src/resource/meta-inf they are in the META-INF of
> the -source jar and the *real* jar.
> 
> But still not inside the javadoc-JAR. Any idea ?
> 
> -M
> 
> On 2/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> I will add the src/site thing. But in the meantime, I have these
>> question:
>> Why is the source-plugin adding the target/ ?
>> Why is this:
>>
>>  <build>
>>     <resources>
>>       <resource>
>>         <directory>src/main/resources</directory>
>>       </resource>
>>       <!-- also include license and notice files in all the jars -->
>>       <resource>
>>         <directory>${basedir}/</directory>
>>         <includes>
>>           <include>NOTICE.txt</include>
>>           <include>LICENSE.txt</include>
>>           <include>INCUBATOR_NOTICE.txt</include>
>>         </includes>
>>         <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
>>       </resource>
>>     </resources>
>>
>> not applied to the javadoc/sources plugin ?
>>
>> thx,
>> M
>>
>> On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Sorry for the delay (board report time)..
>> >
>> > - Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an
>> exclude of that specifically)
>> > - Source jar src/site don't contain licenses
>> > - Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license (since javadoc
>> is generated the html doesn't
>> > need apache headers)
>> >
>> >
>> > Not blocking :
>> >
>> > In the MANIFEST.MF file I am missing the version of the plugin (for
>> the trinidad core a lot more
>> > important) and also the build version is 1.5. Don't know if that is
>> the target / needed ? (afaik
>> > trinidad core is 1.5)
>> >
>> > If you fix the source and javadoc I am +1 :)
>> >
>> > Sorry for the tough crowd. On the other hand : if you get it right
>> once, you should be able to get
>> > it right everywhere :)
>> >
>> > Mvgr,
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I finally managed to get some release artifacts published to a "stage
>> > > repo". I used my private Apache account for that ([1]).
>> > >
>> > > Please take a look at the "1.0.0-incubating" artifacts and vote if we
>> > > should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------
>> > > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
>> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> > > [ ] +0
>> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> released,
>> > >         and why..............
>> > > ------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Matthias
>> > >
>> > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>>
>> further stuff:
>> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to