It is basic nettiquette "imho" that it's most effective to keep the relevant discussion on the list. I agree Chris.
On July 9, 2002 03:10 pm, you wrote: > On July 9, 2002 04:01 pm, Matthew Rice wrote: > > "Bruce Balden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > BTW I'd prefer that the mail program did NOT set the Reply-To: header > > > so we can reply to individuals more easily. > > > > After this initial flush of discussion, I agree. > > > > However, this list is being run via ezmlm. Does nayone know how to > > change the reply-to options or set up a digest for that matter? > > But doesn't that defeat the point of having a list as it generates far too > many side bar discussions that are not necessarily public with a corollary > loss in tracking project evolution. > > Chris H > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
