On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> agreed. CLUE should, at least in the early days, stick to the lowest common > denominator: the Linux brand. it can meld both Free software and Open Source > benefits/approaches to achieve this end, but should remain focussed on > promoting Linux. Just noticed a poor use of language on my part: When I was using the word "advocacy" I was thinking of governments, and not general users. It might be because I hang out with too many bureaucrats these days ;-) Advocacy/promotion/marketing/support to a user community is a critical issue. Maybe it would suffice if CLUE stuck with that needed support? --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> See http://weblog.flora.ca/ for announcements, activities, and opinions Getting Open Source and Linux INto GovernmentS | No2Violence in Politics http://www.flora.org/dmca/forum/942 | http://www.no-dot.ca/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
