At 08:38 AM 8/1/02, you wrote: > I am not questioning whether or not CLUE should be "license liberal" if >it creates a SIG for Linux professionals. > > What I am doing is questioning the use of the phrase "professional" to >itself be associated with being "license liberal". > > This is important for CLUE. If people like myself who have business >models which are not "license liberal" feel like our beliefs/businesses >are being questioned all the time, we are not likely going to be part of a >SIG. > > There is a difference between a "diversity of people" and a "diversity >of licenses".
The SIG is only going to deal with violating licenses not with stating which is acceptable and which isn't. Like if a professional member makes some upgrades to a gpl program and releases binaries but not the source. It would never force members to accept licenses even if it could. -- Mark Lane Hard Data Ltd. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 01-780-456-9771 FAX: 01-780-456-9772 11060 - 166 Avenue Edmonton, AB, Canada T5X 1Y3 http://www.harddata.com/ --> Ask me about our Affordable Alpha Systems! <--
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
