On the flipside consider that it's the persona of the city and the government of said city in theory could say that they should have control over how its' image is used. Especially considering all the property is in part city owned and in part privately. On face copyright it's legit. Should it be this way? I dunno but,if you want to protect copyright, it may have to be.
-A > From: Road Runner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:27:03 -0600 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AP] Extreme copyrights > > Mike, > > I sent off an E-mail to the district attorney of San Diego, California to > see if one really does need to pay a fee to shoot a video clip of the > San Diego City skyline. I'll report what I find out in a few days. > > I agree with your assessment of copyright laws. > > John > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
