It could be worth it for it has at least two advantages: 1) it is widescreen, and 2) many DVD players may upscale the image (if it has sufficient bit rate as produced by HD but not SD) by a certain amount. Temper that with how many of your viewers will be using the older 4:3 TV screens, where upscaling is useless. Be aware render time is affected not only by the number of pixels per frame, but also by the type and amount of effects applied whether SD or HD. In addition to render time is the encoding time.
Long term, it appears SD will disappear someday on TV sets, even though it is coexisting today. However, mobile devices impose an entirely different set of considerations so maybe SD or some variation of it will hang around for that reason, I don't know. Whether or not you "change" to HD is up to you and what your audience appreciates. Lee -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leonel Dolara Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AP] My intro to HD - help me decide! Oh, I did not know. I thought that nowadays all DVD and TV sets will take NTSC or PAL as well. And I thought of PAL as I supposed it has more resolution - 720x576 vs 720x480. Anyway, do you think it is worthy to change to HD if I still will have to end up the project on a standard DVD? I mean, yes I will have a better image quality when editing, but the render will be slower and the quality of the final images in the DVD may not be significatively better than before... 2011/6/2 Lee Menningen <[email protected]> > > > Leonel > > Whether or not you use PAL is dictated by the equipment the viewer has > - it is not a "better" issue because you don't have much choice! > > Premiere Pro has presets for NTSC to DVD which are what I use. I've > never paid attention to PAL but hopefully PPro has some PAL presets you can use. > > > Lee > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > On Behalf Of Leonel Dolara > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:24 AM > > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AP] My intro to HD - help me decide! > > Ok, thanks! What about the render? My idea is to edit in AVCHD in > Premiere and then export to standard DVD. Do you think the rendering > process will be slower? > And what setting should I adjust when exporting? I think that PAL will > be better, but anything else? > Thank you very much! > > 2011/6/2 Lee Menningen <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Leonel > > > > The image quality should be at least as good as DV, but likely a > > little better because DV does not show itself at the highest DVD > > limit. You can control the image quality of a DVD to only a small > > extent. The DVD standard may cause it to down scale the HD a little > > bit, so you won't see its full potential. Also note that an HD image > > is usually widescreen 16:9 aspect while your DV is the old 4:3 > > aspect ratio and that, in and of itself, is a huge improvement. > > > > If you want to maintain full HD quality on screen you can burn to a > > Blu-ray DVD at the full bit rate. However, that interjects a whole > > new set of complications which is why most people avoid Blu-ray like > > a > plague. > > Surprisingly, many DVD players today will upscale a DVD (sent to a > > HD TV on its HDMI port) wherever possible making it show better than > > at standard definition, although still not as good as full > > definition. (I don't know which players will and which ones won't, > > or how you can tell whether a specific one will.) > > > > Lee > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > > [email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Leonel Dolara > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:00 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AP] My intro to HD - help me decide! > > > > > > Dear Lee, > > > > Thanks for your answer. I don't plan to mix both kind of videos, I > > was wondering if the resulting DVD image quality will be very good > > as it comes from Full HD? > > Or I will still get the same results than shooting with my Mini DV > > Canon Elura? > > When editing in Premiere AVCHD, and then rendering to standard DVDs, > > will the render be slower than before? > > > > 2011/6/1 Lee Menningen <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > There are so many cameras out there, and they all work to one > > > degree or another, that no one can say which camera you should > > > get. This is something you'll have to decide. I know nothing of > > > the Lumix FZ100, so I did a google which came up with this review > > > <http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/panasonic_lumix_dmc_fz100_ > > > re > > > vi > > > ew/> > > > and this one > > > < > > > http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz100/ > > > 45 > > > 05 > > > -6501 _7-34150249.html> right on top. Maybe they'll help you decide. > > > > > > As far as comparing the Canon to the Panasonic inside of Premiere > > > Pro > > > - it is unlikely that PPro will behave much different between them. > > > The performance of PPro is driven mostly by the codec's, the > > > amount and type of effects, and other matters that are independent > > > of the camera > > itself. > > > > > > Keep in mind that the frame size of HD is different than the frame > > > size of DV, so there will be size and resolution issues if you > > > attempt them both on the same timeline. Nevertheless, they can be > mixed. > > > > > > Lee > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > > > [email protected]] > > > On Behalf Of Leonel Dolara > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:24 AM > > > To: Adobe Premiere > > > Subject: [AP] My intro to HD - help me decide! > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I am still editing video from my Canon Elura 100 that uses MiniDV > > > and everything goes right. > > > But I am very willing to start editing and shooting in HD, but > > > before I buy anything, I would like to follow your advices. > > > > > > My idea is to buy the Panasonic Lumix FZ100, both for taking > > > pictures and for shooting in Full HD. Is it the right choice? (I > > > have read reviews and know the usual issues of the Panasonic's on > > > low light noise, but I have the > > > FZ8 and I'm already used to it and never was a real problem). > > > The format in this case is AVCHD, that Premiere supports. > > > The thing is that it's very possible that I will need to render my > > > projects in standard DVDs yet. > > > So... my main doubts are: > > > > > > The resulting DVD image quality will be very good as it comes from > > > Full > > HD? > > > Or I will still get the same results than shooting with my Canon Elura? > > > When editing in Premiere AVCHD, and then rendering to standard > > > DVDs, will the render be slower than before? > > > > > > For you to know: I have the intel i7, quad-core (8 threads) and > > > 8GB > RAM. > > > Windows 7 64 bits, Adobe Premiere CS5. Nvidia Quadro FX380. > > > > > > If you think that I should go another path, notice that what I > > > will like to have is the possibility of shooting in HD, still be > > > able to render to standard DVDs, and I will really like not to > > > have to wait the real time capture that a MiniDV takes. > > > > > > As always, I will be expecting your answers anxiously. > > > > > > Thanks to all in advance. > > > > > > -- > > > Leonel Dolara > > > Actor y Director > > > leoneldolara.webs.com ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
