Hi Zlatko! Andrew Raibeck is a person from TSM Development at Tivoli. So his statements are in fact Tivoli statements, unless otherwise specified, that is. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-----Original Message----- From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 16:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients First of all I do not know Andy's position at Tivoli. And read what is written in the README: "This is not officially supported by IBM, but IBM support people do participate in the discussions, along with other users." So IMHO here Andy is just a colleague. More skilled in ADSM/TSM, closer to the developers, but just a colleague. If something shows up on the web-site or in docs on media that would be official. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 19.10.2001 17:57:48 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients Andrew Raibeck answered "I am almost certain that this change in behavior is not deliberate. The APAR is going to be handled as a code defect" Isn't that you'r Tivoli official answer? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -----Original Message----- From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients This was already discussed in the list. Look for the thread "Windows client behavior change at 4.2.1.0" and answer of Andrew Raibeck from 9.10.2001. But it is possible that Andy and this Bob are just having different PERSONAL opinions. We still do not have answer from any Tivoli official, do we? Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant "Subash, Chandra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 18.10.2001 07:41:31 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients i HAVE GOT THIS EMAIL FROM ONE OF MY FRIENDS. GUYS WHAT DO YOU THINK IS IT TRUE ? Hi Guys According to Tivoli Support they have made an alteration to way client v4.2.1 reports Result code 4 to the server. Earlier version clients would allow for a certain number of files to fail during the backup and still report to the server that the Schedule was successful. However version 4.2.1 has been altered so that a result code of failed will be reported to the server even if 1 file fails during a backup. ntcmachine had been failing on some WINNT system files which I have added exceptions for under direction of Tivoli support and now backups of this machine seem to be successful. Bob from Tivoli suggested that if we are worried about seeing failed result codes on the daily report that there may be a way to generate a report listing statistics of how many files or how much data had been backed up from each machine to provide a more accurate picture as to whether the backups were successful. ********************************************************************** This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **********************************************************************
