I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process in the order which the command was received.
Sung Y. Lee E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] So what you're saying is if I start 2 processes to copy 2 disk pools to separate tapes and both take a separate tape drive the smaller pool that was started second won't finish before the first one. I don't see why a process that does not need a tape drive can't finish before one that does, that makes no sense to me. It's as if the system can only do one thing at a time. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
