I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process in the order which
the command was received.
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Gill, Geoffrey
L." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<GEOFFREY.L.GILL@ cc:
SAIC.COM> Subject: Checkin libvol V5.1.1 server
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
07/16/2002 01:07
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I just upgraded my test server to TSM 5.1.1. I can't say I ever noticed
this
on the V4 server so I don't know if this is the same or different. I
checked
in 9 scratch volumes separately so I could watch all 9 processes finish.
The
first 6 I purposefully use checkl=yes to force mounts on drives to see if
they were ok. The last 3 with checkl=no. The last 3 process with checkl=no
sat there till the last process of checkl=yes finished before they ran. Not
sure why a process not checking a label couldn't finish sooner than one
that
is. Anyone else seen this?
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858) 826-4062
Pager: (877) 905-7154
